FHA: The Next Bailout
September 3, 2009 in Best Of The Storm, Home Economics by Greg Fielding
The Wall Street Journal reports Loan Losses Spark Concern Over FHA
…Rising defaults have eaten through the FHA’s cushion. Some 7.8% of FHA loans at the end of the second quarter were 90 days late or more, or in foreclosure, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, a figure roughly equal to the national average for all loans. That is up from 5.4% a year ago.
Resulting FHA losses are offset by premiums paid by borrowers. Federal law says the FHA must maintain, after expected losses, reserves equal to at least 2% of the loans insured by the agency. The ratio last year was around 3%, down from 6.4% in 2007.
If its reserves fall short, the agency is obliged to notify Congress, which could spark a commotion over the extent to which the government is funding losses in the housing market. Some housing analysts have said losses might lead the FHA to pull back lending, which has helped boost flagging housing demand.
A senior official at HUD, which oversees the FHA, said there is “no risk” that the FHA would require money from Congress if the ratio falls below 2%. Asked about the agency’s capital ratio, the official said a report detailing that number won’t be completed until the FHA’s fiscal year ends Sept. 30.
HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said in June, “there’s a better than even chance that we will stay above the two percent reserve threshold. That suggests, not just for the 2010 business, but overall for the portfolio, that we’ll more than likely to stay out of a broader need for any taxpayer funding.”
Hmmm…you believe them? Isn’t this what they say over and over again before getting bailed out? It’s no secret the FHA has been making some of the riskiest loans over the last few years. This will be a bloodbath.
Related posts:
- Changes to FHA guidelines are coming… From CNNMoney.com, by Tami Luhby — It’s going to be harder to get a government-backed mortgage from now on. Looking...
- Government lifts bailout cap for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac The Mercury New reports that The Obama administration says it is removing the $400 billion financial cap it will provide...
FHA has always been in the business of making the riskier loans. They were the orginal “sub prime” lender. They have tightened the rules significantly over the past years but they have always been in the business of fully documented loans. I would think that the higher default rates are more a function of the market we are in where people are walking due to be being underwater
To get a better idea of how bad FHA is, check out this post on their default rates:
http://housingstorm.com/2009/09/fha-default-raltes/