Housing Recovery May Take More Than 10 Years

November 12, 2009 in Best Of The Storm, Featured, Fresh Perspectives, Home Economics, The Buying and Selling Process by Jon Maddux

2707571409_dce2b80aa7-300x300In Fort Meyers Florida,  a home that sold for $500,000 in 2006 may now be worth only $205,000. The % of decline from the peak in Ft Meyers is 59%.  Listen carefully to this very sobering fact,  it would take appreciation of 144% for the homeowner to get back to the purchase value of $500,000.

To get to 144% appreciation at an  average annual rate of 5% it would take over 18 years to recover the equity. OVER 18 YEARS!

In Akron OH, a home that sold for $250,000 in 2006 may now be worth only $130,000. The % of decline from the peak in Akron is 48%.  it would take appreciation of over 92% for the homeowner to get back to the purchase value of $250,000.

To get to 92% appreciation at an average annual rate of 5% it would take over 11 years to recover the equity. OVER 13 YEARS!

In Riverside California a home that sold for $500,000 in 2006 may now be worth only $300,000.  The % of decline from the peak in Riverside is 40%.  it would take appreciation of around 66% for the homeowner to get back to the purchase value of $500,000.

To get to 66% appreciation at a historical average annual rate of 5% it would take around 10 years to recover the equity. OVER 10 YEARS!

This is a very scary fact that I haven’t heard much talk about.  The simple fact that appreciation has to almost be double in some cases than the depreciation is VERY chilling.    Recovery as defined in the dictionary is: “a regaining of something lost or stolen”.  Equity has been lost.  To recover that lost equity it may take more than 10 years in many hard hit areas of America.  A decade is a long time to be underwater.  Throughout the last decade, people got used to refinancing every few years.  They would pull out equity and pay off credit cards or use the cash to do home improvements.   Equity is gone and so are the days of 20-30% annual appreciation.   It’s like shoots and ladders. Going down is quick and sudden. Climbing back up, takes time and effort.  Money is easy spent yet hard to save.

Jim Haughey, RCD Chief Economist said on May 15, 2009

The surplus of homes for sale is now over 2.0 million, mostly existing homes, and will still be over 1.0 million by the end of 2010 even if housing start increases are slim and household formation returns to non-recessionary trends. The surplus a year and half ahead will be partly due to the excess building in 2003-07, partly due to the still depressed, although recovering economy, and partly due to lower housing demand from reduced net immigration, real estate speculation and willingness to buy second homes.

Combined with the new wave of foreclosures that are being initiated, I predict housing will not be stable or see decent appreciation for several years.  See inventory chart below as published by the Wall Street Journal on May 21, 2009.

[real estate inventory banks]

Investors and speculators buying properties does NOT deplete the supply as reported by the Wall Street Journal on May 21, 2009

Though not every cash sale involves an investor, the investors often use cash because they can close quicker and get a better return. In the Phoenix area, for example, about 38% of April sales of single-family homes were all-cash deals. In Punta Gorda, Fla., the figure was 67%, and in the Las Vegas area, total cash sales were 39%.

Barclays Capital estimates that banks and loan investors owned 765,500 foreclosed homes as of April 1, up from 629,100 a year earlier. The inventory is expected peak at about 1.3 million homes in mid- to late 2010, according to Barclays.

The investors are no panacea to the nation’s housing woes. When the market improves, many of them could put their houses up for sale, reinflating supply.

All this investor buying isn’t depleting supply, it’s only shifting it around,” says Mr. Allen of Gorilla Capital.

On Friday January 30, 2009 Robert Shiller said:

“It is quite possible that house prices fall more strongly than they did during the global economic crisis of 80 years ago. The real estate crisis could last 10 more years.”

My Thoughts

A decade is a long time to be under water.

www.YouWalkAway.com

Does it make financial sense to walk away and rent?

Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as foreclosure or legal advice. All site content, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell real estate, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult a lawyer or an adviser before making any legal or investment decisions.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • NewsVine
  • PDF
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Wikio
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts:

  1. Recovery: How Long Did it Take Last Time? Buying into the abyss proved profitable in the early ‘90s, is this time any different?...
  2. Getting Back on Track: Are We There Yet? Many believe the bottom in housing has come and gone. Are they right?...
  3. One of the most real descriptions of what could happen… I was looking through my Blog community and this article by Jon Maddux and the debate that is looming for many...
  4. Home Prices: A Much Needed Breather After a historic rise, an equally historic fall....