<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Back on Track: Are We There Yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://housingstorm.com/2010/01/getting-back-on-track-are-we-there-yettrack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://housingstorm.com/2010/01/getting-back-on-track-are-we-there-yettrack/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News from Real Estate Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Jeffery</title>
		<link>http://housingstorm.com/2010/01/getting-back-on-track-are-we-there-yettrack/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Jeffery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingstorm.com/?p=2458#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>Dave,

You are right, there are definitely markets where values seem to be holding. My one concern is that almost without fail, these are the most distressed areas, ones where foreclosures dominate sales. With the government so actively involved in keeping inventory off the market, will that disrupt what would normally be a natural correction? True, government has always played an active role in the housing market, but there are also plenty of markets that dipped well below their historical trends before Washington got aggressive with foreclosure moratoria.

Likewise, in the higher end markets (look out for next Monday&#039;s article looking at Palo Alto, CA&#039;s long term chart) historical trends are not yet in play.

Thanks for the comments

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>You are right, there are definitely markets where values seem to be holding. My one concern is that almost without fail, these are the most distressed areas, ones where foreclosures dominate sales. With the government so actively involved in keeping inventory off the market, will that disrupt what would normally be a natural correction? True, government has always played an active role in the housing market, but there are also plenty of markets that dipped well below their historical trends before Washington got aggressive with foreclosure moratoria.</p>
<p>Likewise, in the higher end markets (look out for next Monday&#8217;s article looking at Palo Alto, CA&#8217;s long term chart) historical trends are not yet in play.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Roberts</title>
		<link>http://housingstorm.com/2010/01/getting-back-on-track-are-we-there-yettrack/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://housingstorm.com/?p=2458#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>Applying a long term housing appreciation trendline to your graph would indicate that prices today aren&#039;t too far from where historical indicators would place them. There&#039;s a clear bubble from 2004 to 2007, but in the markets I look at we are holding value today, especially in entry level homes. Your chart shows the same thing with the uptick in year over year value for the last six months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applying a long term housing appreciation trendline to your graph would indicate that prices today aren&#8217;t too far from where historical indicators would place them. There&#8217;s a clear bubble from 2004 to 2007, but in the markets I look at we are holding value today, especially in entry level homes. Your chart shows the same thing with the uptick in year over year value for the last six months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

